Cornwall on Hudson photo by Michael Nelson
May 11, 2025
Welcome! Click here to Login
News from Cornwall and Cornwall On Hudson, New York
News
Events
Donate
Our Town
Photos of Our Town
Education
Help Wanted
The Outdoors
Classifieds
Support Our Advertisers
About Us
Advertise with Us
Contact Us
Click to visit the
Official Village Site
Click to visit the
Official Town Site
Cornwall Public Library
Latest Newsletter

Letters to the Editor: A Toast to the Metric System

March 05, 2009

Cornwall-on-Hudson resident Gary Regan shares his open letter to President Obama that first appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle.  He is the author of "The Joy of Mixology" and other books.


Dear President Obama:

I do not represent the San Francisco Chronicle on the issue I'm about to open up, but I think that I can safely say that I speak for a large number of American bartenders when I ask you to consider encouraging, or even demanding, that everyone in this great country of ours make a far bigger effort to "plan the increasing use of the metric system in the United States," words taken from the Metric Conversion Act of 1975.

That's right, Mister President, we made a commitment to go metric more than 30 years ago.

I'm well aware, of course, that there are far more important issues for you to tackle right now, but I think that if you could see your way to giving this topic just a little thought, you might see that, if this country took steps to join the rest of the world in their metricity (yes, I just made that word up), there might be some advantages to the switch that aren't immediately apparent.

Think, for instance, of all the jobs that would be created. For a start, thousands of packaging designers would be called into action to redesign labels on cans of soup, and bags of sugar and all manner of boxes and cans and bottles and bags. Then all the gas pumps would have to be recalibrated. That's a job and a half, huh? Next we'd have to retool the machines that produce milk cartons so we could finally buy our milk in liters instead of pints. (I hope, President Obama, that I don't have to point out the fact that the liquor industry in America is one industry that went metric years ago. So far ahead of the milk guys ...)

Is it also possible, Mister President, that our exports will grow if we go metric. Your average chappie in Britain, I believe, would be far more likely to buy an American apple pie if he knew that it was 25 centimeters in diameter. Tell him it's a 10-inch pie and there's a good chance that he'll buy an inferior English pie instead.

When you took the reins, President Obama, countries that have not been enamored of us in recent years immediately gave us another chance to show how great we could be. Surely we must seize this opportunity to show them what we're made of. If we pushed the metric issue, those Europeans would no longer be able to laugh at us behind our backs. Not too very long ago I visited a bar in Paris where I overheard one Frenchman say to another, "Oh, zoze Americains! Zeh steel theenk in ounces, you know. Ooh la la!" I left that bar in a hurry and went straight to the nearest McDonald's for a Royal Cheese (that's what the French call a Quarter Pounder).

There's one more reason that I'm urging you to work on this issue, Mister President, and it involves cocktails. As I'm sure you know, the cocktail was invented in America, and American bartenders have always been regarded as being the very best in the world, but the sad fact is that we're beginning to lose ground. Bartenders in London, Paris, Sydney, Hong Kong, Bratislava, Moscow and Rome simply don't understand our recipes, you see. Ounces mean nothing to them.

If you act now, though, the bartenders of America will be quick to order their metric jiggers, and American cocktails will be once again be served at the best bars in the world. You just watch us, sir. We'll jump right in there, and before you know it the rest of the world will once again marvel at the creativity of the men and women who work behind the bars of America.

I've created a drink, Mister President, that we could perhaps use to toast you if you can pull this metric thing off. The ingredients are all American, and although most of them are made in California, I did include an East Coast product, too. It comes from a family that supplied George Washington's troops with their apple brandy. Pretty cool, huh?

In closing, President Obama, I'd like to wish you and your family all the best for the next four, or eight, years, and if I might be allowed to offer to show you around some of the fine bars we have here in San Francisco, I'd be happy to pick up the tab next time you're in town. (We'll go nonalcoholic if it's more politically correct.)

The We Really Really Love Our New President Cocktail

Makes 1 drink

  • 22.5 ml ( 3/4 ounce) Laird's Bottled-in-Bond Applejack from New Jersey
  • 22.5 ml ( 3/4 ounce) Germain-Robin Select Barrel XO Alambic Brandy from Ukiah
  • 15 ml ( 1/2 ounce) ruby port from the Charbay distillery in the Napa Valley
  • 7.5 ml ( 1/4 ounce) Qi black tea liqueur made at the St. George distillery in Alameda
  • 1 Meyer lemon twist from California, as garnish

Instructions: Place all ingredients except the twist in a mixing glass. Stir over ice and strain into a chilled American cocktail glass. Add the American garnish.




Comments:

So, if I order a "wee dram" of single malt at your fine establishment, I'll have to ask for how many mililiters?


posted by Scott Mathews on 03/06/09 at 9:53 AM

I'm afraid that I don't have an establishment, Scott. Heck, I don't even have a bar. A standard measure of hooch in the USA, though, is 1.5 ounces, and that translates to approx 45 ml. "Wee Dram" should work just as well, though.


posted by Gary Regan on 03/06/09 at 1:07 PM

I agree. Some things are just American, and we should keep them American. The Cocktail is one such thing. The metric issue is something we can leave as is, too. If we want to leave it to our children to deal with. It will have to be dealt with one of these days, though,and we are, I believe, the last hold-out on this issue. Driving on the other side of the road, I'm afraid, is just a curveball that has no relevance here. Sorry--I'm really not trying to be mean-spirited, but it has no relevance, and I think that, as light-hearted as my article was, this is a serious issue right now.


posted by Gary Regan on 03/06/09 at 3:37 PM

As a Scientist, horse rider, and lover of scotch, I totally agree with Gary.

So far as driving on the other side of the road - the English adopted their driving orientation to model knights who were jousting. Most people are right handed and thus the knights held their weapons in their right hand an passed each other as such. Driving with the driver on the right hand side models knights passing each other in the same fashion.

We here in America adopted our driving fashion for one reason - to be different from the English.

SO, we use the English system of measurement, while England has already converted to metric. Why? For the reason listed in the comment above, just to be American. Yet if we think about it ... it is the ENGLISH system of measurement. We are not being American, we are just being unyielding. Why use metric? Why not use metric? Metric is based off of 1 and 10. 1 is a lot easier number to do math with than random english units (12 in-1ft, 5280ft-1mi)

So to all out there who dont like metric - how many of you dont like math either? You would do a lot better with the metric system than you think.

Kuddos Gary - and if we are getting apple pie, can it come from Jones Farm?


posted by Melissa Vellone on 03/06/09 at 9:57 PM

(written on Saturday, March 7)...I shouldn't be at my computer on this spring-like warm day...wow, it must be 10 degrees out there!


posted by Scott Mathews on 03/07/09 at 12:20 PM

Hmmmm. Doing the math: (58-32)/1.8 =14.44... CORRECTION: wow, it must be 14.44 degrees out there!


posted by Scott Mathews on 03/07/09 at 12:24 PM

Scott,

I commend your proper use of the mathematical conversion from deg F to deg C ... I teach chemistry at RCC and not many of our aspiring students in the area understand that the 1.8 is in the denominator of that equation. GOOD JOB! HOWEVER... as a scientist, the less than 5 C difference between 10C and 14,4 C would be negligible. Please dont be so hard on yourself next time.


posted by Melissa Vellone on 03/08/09 at 11:40 PM

Add a Comment:

Please signup or login to add a comment.



© 2025 by Cornwall Media, LLC . All Rights Reserved. | photo credit: Michael Nelson
Advertise with Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy